Major Constitutional Bodies: ECI, UPSC, Finance Commission, CAG and More
Election Commission, UPSC, Finance Commission, CAG, Attorney General and the national commissions for SCs, STs and backward classes — articles, appointment, tenure, removal, functions.
SyllabusGS II · Appointment to various constitutional posts, powers, functions and responsibilities of various constitutional bodies
Prerequisites: Constitutional Framework · The Union Executive · The Judiciary
The Hook: Who Should Choose the Umpire?
Article 324(2) says the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners shall be appointed by the President, “subject to the provisions of any law made in that behalf by Parliament”. For seven decades, no such law existed, and the Union Government effectively chose the commissioners. In March 2023, a Constitution Bench (Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India) held that until Parliament made a law, appointments would be made on the advice of a committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India. In December 2023, Parliament enacted the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, with a selection committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister.
The episode raises the question every body in this chapter faces: how does the Constitution make an institution independent of the government that appoints it?
The Core Concept
The Constitution protects its watchdog bodies through a common toolkit. Learn the toolkit once and every body becomes easier:
| Safeguard | How it works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Security of tenure | Fixed term; removal only by a special process | CEC and CAG removed like a Supreme Court judge |
| Protected service conditions | Cannot be varied to the officer’s disadvantage after appointment | Article 324(5) proviso (CEC); Article 148(3) proviso (CAG) |
| Charged expenditure | Salaries and expenses not voted by Parliament | Articles 148(6), 322 |
| Post-retirement bar | No further government office | CAG (Article 148(4)); UPSC Chairman (Article 319) |
| Report to a neutral authority | Annual report to the President, laid before Parliament | UPSC (Article 323), CAG (Article 151), NCSC (Article 338) |
1. Election Commission of India (Article 324)
- Composition: the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and such number of Election Commissioners as the President fixes. The Commission was set up on 25 January 1950 (now National Voters’ Day). It became multi-member in October 1989, reverted to single-member in January 1990, and has been multi-member since October 1993. In T.N. Seshan v. Union of India (1995), the Supreme Court upheld the multi-member Commission with decisions by majority.
- Appointment: by the President on the recommendation of the selection committee under the 2023 Act; a search committee headed by the Law Minister prepares a panel.
- Tenure: six years or until the age of 65, whichever is earlier.
- Removal: the CEC only in the manner and on the grounds of a Supreme Court judge; other Election Commissioners only on the recommendation of the CEC (Article 324(5)).
- Functions: superintendence, direction and control of elections to Parliament, State legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President; preparation of electoral rolls; recognition of parties and allotment of symbols; advice to the President and Governors on disqualification of legislators (Articles 103 and 192); enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct.
- Not covered: elections to panchayats and municipalities (State Election Commissions, Articles 243K and 243ZA).
2. Public Service Commissions (Articles 315–323)
| Feature | UPSC | State PSC |
|---|---|---|
| Appointed by | President | Governor |
| Term | Six years or 65 years | Six years or 62 years |
| Removed by | President | President (not the Governor) |
| Grounds of removal | Misbehaviour (after a Supreme Court inquiry whose advice binds the President); insolvency, outside paid employment, infirmity | Same |
| Report to | President (Article 323) | Governor |
- Article 319 bars the Chairman of UPSC from any further employment under the Union or a State. A UPSC member may become Chairman of UPSC or of a State PSC, but nothing else in government.
- Article 320: UPSC conducts examinations and advises on recruitment, promotions, transfers and disciplinary matters. Its advice is not binding. It is not consulted on reservations under Article 16(4) or on claims of SCs and STs under Article 335 (Article 320(4)).
- A Joint State Public Service Commission for two or more States is created by Parliament on the request of the States concerned — it is a statutory body, not a constitutional one.
3. Finance Commission (Article 280)
- Constituted by the President every five years or earlier; a Chairman and four other members.
- Qualifications are set by Parliament in the Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951 — the Chairman must have experience in public affairs.
- Functions: the division of the net proceeds of shared taxes between the Union and the States and their allocation among States; principles of grants-in-aid under Article 275; measures to augment State funds for panchayats and municipalities (added by the 73rd and 74th Amendments); any other matter referred by the President.
- Its recommendations are advisory. The report goes to the President, who lays it before Parliament with an explanatory memorandum on action taken (Article 281).
- The 1st Finance Commission (1951) was chaired by K.C. Neogy; the 15th by N.K. Singh; the 16th, for 2026–31, by Arvind Panagariya.
4. Comptroller and Auditor General (Articles 148–151)
Dr B.R. Ambedkar described the CAG as probably the most important officer under the Constitution, because the CAG checks that money voted by Parliament is spent as Parliament intended.
- Appointment: by the President by warrant under his hand and seal.
- Tenure: six years or 65 years (CAG (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971).
- Removal: like a Supreme Court judge.
- No further office under the Union or any State after leaving office (Article 148(4)).
- Duties (Article 149): audits receipts and expenditure of the Union, the States and Union Territories with legislatures, and bodies substantially financed by them; audits government companies as prescribed by law.
- Reports (Article 151): Union accounts — to the President, laid before Parliament; State accounts — to the Governor, laid before the State legislature.
- The Public Accounts Committee examines CAG reports; the CAG is described as its “friend, philosopher and guide”.
- Types of audit: legal and regulatory audit (mandatory) and propriety and performance audit (discretionary). Since 1976, the CAG has been relieved of compiling Union accounts (separation of accounts from audit).
5. Law officers: Attorney General (Article 76) and Advocate General (Article 165)
| Feature | Attorney General | Advocate General |
|---|---|---|
| Appointed by | President | Governor |
| Qualification | Qualified to be a Supreme Court judge | Qualified to be a High Court judge |
| Tenure | During the pleasure of the President — no fixed term | During the pleasure of the Governor |
| In the legislature | May speak in either House, joint sittings and committees; no vote (Article 88) | May speak in the State legislature; no vote (Article 177) |
The Solicitor General and Additional Solicitors General are not constitutional offices.
6. Commissions for vulnerable groups
graph TD
A[Article 338: one commission for SCs and STs] --> B[89th Amendment, 2003: bifurcated]
B --> C[Article 338: National Commission for Scheduled Castes]
B --> D[Article 338A: National Commission for Scheduled Tribes]
E[102nd Amendment, 2018] --> F[Article 338B: National Commission for Backward Classes]
E --> G[Article 342A: President notifies SEBC list]
H[105th Amendment, 2021] --> I[States regain power to keep their own SEBC lists]- Each commission has a chairperson, vice-chairperson and three members appointed by the President by warrant; each investigates safeguards, inquires into complaints with the powers of a civil court, and reports to the President.
- Article 350B (7th Amendment, 1956): a Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities, appointed by the President, investigates safeguards for linguistic minorities and reports to the President.
- Article 279A: the GST Council (101st Amendment, 2016) — see Centre-State Relations.
Memory Anchors
“Six-Sixty-Five” club — CEC, Election Commissioners, CAG and UPSC members: six years or 65 years. State PSC is the odd one out at 62.
Removed like a Supreme Court judge: “Can Courts Sack?” → CEC, CAG, (and the Supreme Court judge itself). Election Commissioners need the CEC’s recommendation; PSC members need a Supreme Court inquiry.
Article sequence 338 → 338A → 338B: “Caste, Tribe, Backward” — SCs, then STs, then Backward classes — added in 1950, 2003 and 2018.
One-line Mains hook: “An institution is as independent as the process that appoints it and the process that removes it.”
For Prelims
- State PSC members are appointed by the Governor but removed by the President.
- The Chairman of UPSC cannot take any further government employment; a member can become Chairman of UPSC or a State PSC.
- The CAG is appointed by warrant; the Attorney General is not a member of the Cabinet and holds office at the President’s pleasure.
- The Attorney General can speak in Parliament but cannot vote.
- NCST (Article 338A) — 89th Amendment, 2003; NCBC (Article 338B) — 102nd Amendment, 2018.
- National Commission for Women, NHRC and the National Commission for Minorities are statutory, not constitutional.
For Mains
- Dimensions: independence (appointment, tenure, removal, finances); accountability (reports to Parliament, follow-up by committees); effectiveness (advisory vs binding powers); capacity (staff, technology); federal balance (State-level counterparts).
- Keywords: institutional autonomy, integrity institutions, performance audit, fourth-branch institutions, collegial decision-making, chilling effect, regulatory capture.
- Value-addition: T.N. Seshan (1995) — multi-member ECI with majority decisions; Anoop Baranwal (2023) — need for an independent appointment process; Ambedkar on the CAG; the 2nd ARC’s recommendation for a collegium-style process for selecting the CEC and Election Commissioners (in its report on Ethics in Governance).
Common Traps
In the News
- March 2023 — Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India on the appointment of Election Commissioners.
- December 2023 — Parliament enacts the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023.
Practice
Prelims
With reference to the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, consider the following statements:
- The CAG is appointed by the President and can be removed only in the manner and on the grounds of a judge of the Supreme Court.
- After ceasing to hold office, the CAG is eligible for further office under the Government of India.
- The salary and other conditions of service of the CAG are determined by Parliament.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Solution
Statement 1 is correct (Article 148(1)). Statement 2 is wrong — Article 148(4) makes the CAG ineligible for further office under the Union or any State. Statement 3 is correct (Article 148(3)); Parliament did so by the CAG (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971.
Answer: B
How many of the following are constitutional bodies?
- Finance Commission
- National Commission for Backward Classes
- GST Council
- Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities
Solution
All four are created by the Constitution: Article 280, Article 338B (102nd Amendment, 2018), Article 279A (101st Amendment, 2016), and Article 350B (7th Amendment, 1956).
Answer: D
A member of a State Public Service Commission can be removed from office by:
Solution
Under Article 317, members of both UPSC and State PSCs are removed by the President, even though State PSC members are appointed by the Governor. For misbehaviour, the President must first refer the matter to the Supreme Court; the Governor can only suspend a State PSC member pending that inquiry.
Answer: A
Mains
The credibility of the Election Commission of India depends as much on how its members are appointed as on how it conducts elections. Discuss in the light of recent developments.
Solution
Introduction: Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction and control of elections in the Election Commission. Its credibility rests on being — and being seen as — independent of the party in power.
Body:
- Constitutional safeguards: CEC removable only like a Supreme Court judge; conditions of service cannot be varied to disadvantage; expenses and decisions insulated by convention.
- Gaps: Article 324(2) left appointment to a future law; Election Commissioners lack the CEC’s removal protection; no bar on post-retirement appointments.
- Recent developments: Anoop Baranwal (2023) — interim committee including the CJI; the 2023 Act — committee of the PM, Leader of the Opposition and a Cabinet Minister, with a search committee; debate over executive majority in the committee.
- Conduct-side credibility: Model Code enforcement, transparency in EVM/VVPAT processes, voter-roll revisions, timely and even-handed action on complaints.
- Reform ideas: 2nd ARC and Law Commission suggestions for broad-based selection; equal removal protection for all Election Commissioners; charged expenditure for the Commission; cooling-off periods.
Conclusion: An umpire must be both fair and seen to be fair. A balanced appointment process, equal protection for all members and transparent functioning together sustain public trust in elections.
Quick Revision
| Body | Article | Appointed by | Term | Removal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEC / ECs | 324 | President (2023 Act committee) | 6 yrs / 65 | CEC like SC judge; ECs on CEC’s recommendation |
| UPSC | 315–323 | President | 6 yrs / 65 | President, after SC inquiry for misbehaviour |
| State PSC | 315–323 | Governor | 6 yrs / 62 | President |
| Finance Commission | 280 | President | Set by order | — |
| CAG | 148–151 | President (warrant) | 6 yrs / 65 | Like SC judge |
| Attorney General | 76 | President | Pleasure | President |
| NCSC / NCST / NCBC | 338 / 338A / 338B | President (warrant) | Set by rules | — |
Key Takeaways
- Constitutional bodies draw their independence from tenure, removal procedure, charged expenses and post-retirement bars.
- Removal “like a Supreme Court judge” applies to the CEC and the CAG — not to Election Commissioners or PSC members.
- Most constitutional bodies advise rather than decide; their real power lies in reports to Parliament and public scrutiny.
Related Topics
- Constitutional Bodies — quick revision
- Constitutional Bodies — practice questions
- The Representation of the People Acts
- Statutory, Regulatory and Quasi-Judicial Bodies
- Centre-State Relations (Finance Commission, GST Council)