Centre-State Relations: Legislative, Administrative and Financial
Centre-State relations for UPSC: Seventh Schedule, Articles 249–254, Articles 256–263, fiscal transfers, GST Council, Article 356, and the Sarkaria and Punchhi Commissions.
SyllabusGS II · Functions and responsibilities of the Union and the States, issues and challenges pertaining to the federal structure
Prerequisites: Constitutional Framework · Parliament · State Government
The Hook: Can a Governor Sit on a Bill Forever?
In April 2025, the Supreme Court (State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu) held that the Governor had acted unlawfully by withholding assent to ten bills and then reserving them for the President after the State legislature had passed them again. The Court read time limits into Article 200 and, using Article 142, treated the bills as having received assent. The Union Government then sought the Court’s opinion under Article 143 on whether such timelines could be imposed at all.
The dispute raises the question this chapter answers: in a “Union of States”, where does the Centre’s legitimate oversight end and the States’ autonomy begin?
The Core Concept
India’s federalism is real but centralised. The Constitution divides power between two levels of government (a federal feature) but gives the Union the decisive edge in emergencies, finance and administration (unitary features). K.C. Wheare called the result “quasi-federal”; the Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) held that federalism is part of the basic structure.
Dr B.R. Ambedkar explained the phrase “Union of States” in the Constituent Assembly: the Indian federation was not the result of an agreement among States, and therefore no State has the right to secede from it.
Federal and unitary features side by side
| Federal features | Unitary (centralising) features |
|---|---|
| Two levels of government (dual polity) | Strong Centre; residuary powers with the Union |
| Written Constitution | Single Constitution for Union and States |
| Division of powers (Seventh Schedule) | Single citizenship |
| Supremacy of the Constitution | Parliament can alter State boundaries (Article 3) |
| Rigid amendment for federal provisions (Article 368(2) proviso) | Governor appointed by the President |
| Independent judiciary | Integrated judiciary; All India Services (Article 312) |
| Bicameralism (Rajya Sabha represents States) | Unequal representation of States in the Rajya Sabha |
| — | Emergency provisions (Articles 352, 356, 360) |
1. Legislative relations (Articles 245–255)
Territorial extent (Article 245): Parliament legislates for the whole or any part of India and can make extra-territorial laws; a State legislature legislates for its own territory.
Subject matter (Article 246 and the Seventh Schedule):
| List | Who legislates | Originally | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| List I — Union | Parliament exclusively | 97 entries | Defence, foreign affairs, banking, atomic energy |
| List II — State | State legislatures (normally) | 66 entries | Police, public order, public health, agriculture |
| List III — Concurrent | Both | 47 entries | Criminal law, marriage, education, forests |
| Residuary | Parliament (Article 248; Entry 97, List I) | — | Subjects in no list |
The 42nd Amendment (1976) moved five subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List: education, forests, weights and measures, protection of wild animals and birds, and administration of justice (constitution and organisation of all courts except the Supreme Court and High Courts).
When Parliament can legislate on a State subject:
| Article | Situation | Key conditions |
|---|---|---|
| 249 | National interest | Rajya Sabha resolution supported by two-thirds of members present and voting; resolution valid for one year, renewable any number of times; the law lapses six months after the resolution ceases |
| 250 | National Emergency in operation | Law lapses six months after the emergency ends |
| 252 | Two or more States request it | Their legislatures pass resolutions; other States may adopt the law later; only Parliament can amend or repeal it. Examples: Prize Competitions Act, 1955; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 |
| 253 | To implement international treaties and agreements | No State consent needed |
| 356 | President’s Rule in a State | Parliament makes laws for the State (or delegates the power to the President) |
Repugnancy (Article 254): if a State law on a Concurrent subject conflicts with a Union law, the Union law prevails. Exception, Article 254(2): a State law reserved for and assented to by the President prevails in that State — but Parliament can still override it later.
Control over State legislation: the Governor may reserve certain bills for the President (Article 200); the President may give or withhold assent (Article 201). Some bills need the President’s prior sanction (for example, bills restricting freedom of trade under Article 304(b)).
2. Administrative relations (Articles 256–263)
- Article 256: a State’s executive power must be exercised to ensure compliance with Union laws; the Union may give directions for this.
- Article 257: a State’s executive power must not impede the Union’s; the Union may direct States on communications of national or military importance and the protection of railways.
- Article 258: the President may, with a State government’s consent, entrust Union functions to the State. Article 258A (7th Amendment, 1956) allows the reverse.
- Article 365: if a State fails to comply with Union directions, the President may hold that the State’s government cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution — a gateway to Article 356.
- Article 262: Parliament may provide for adjudication of inter-State river water disputes and exclude courts’ jurisdiction — done through the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.
- Article 263: the President may establish an Inter-State Council. It was set up in 1990 by Presidential order, on the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendation, chaired by the Prime Minister.
- Article 312: new All India Services may be created if the Rajya Sabha resolves so by a two-thirds majority of members present and voting.
Extra-constitutional and statutory forums: Zonal Councils (five, created by the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 — statutory, chaired by the Union Home Minister); the North Eastern Council (North Eastern Council Act, 1971); and NITI Aayog (an executive body set up in 2015).
3. Financial relations (Articles 264–293)
graph TD
A[Union taxes] --> B[Article 270: divisible pool shared with States]
B --> C[Finance Commission fixes share - Article 280]
A --> D[Grants-in-aid]
D --> E[Article 275: statutory grants on FC advice]
D --> F[Article 282: discretionary grants for any public purpose]
G[GST - Article 246A] --> H[GST Council - Article 279A]
H --> I[Recommends rates and rules to Union and States]- Article 246A (101st Amendment, 2016) gives Parliament and State legislatures concurrent power to levy GST; only Parliament levies GST on inter-State supplies (Article 269A, IGST).
- Article 268: duties levied by the Union but collected and appropriated by the States (for example, certain stamp duties).
- Article 270: taxes levied and collected by the Union and shared with States. After the 80th Amendment (2000), the entire pool of Union taxes (with stated exceptions such as cesses and surcharges) is divisible.
- Article 275: statutory grants-in-aid to States in need, charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, on Finance Commission advice.
- Article 280: Finance Commission every five years or earlier. The 15th Finance Commission (chair N.K. Singh) recommended a 41% share of the divisible pool for States for 2021–26. The 16th Finance Commission (chair Arvind Panagariya) covers 2026–31.
- Article 282: discretionary grants by the Union or a State for any public purpose, even outside its legislative competence — the route used for many centrally sponsored schemes.
- Article 293: a State cannot borrow without the Union’s consent if it still owes the Union part of an earlier loan.
GST Council (Article 279A): chaired by the Union Finance Minister; members are the Union Minister of State for Finance and each State’s Finance Minister. The Union’s vote carries one-third weight and the States together two-thirds; decisions need a three-fourths majority of weighted votes of members present and voting. In Union of India v. Mohit Minerals (May 2022), the Supreme Court held that the Council’s recommendations are persuasive, not binding, on Parliament and State legislatures.
4. Article 356 and the Bommai line
Article 356 allows President’s Rule when the President, on the Governor’s report or otherwise, is satisfied that a State’s government cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution.
- Approval by both Houses within two months; continues for six months at a time; maximum three years.
- Beyond one year only if a National Emergency is in operation and the Election Commission certifies that elections cannot be held (44th Amendment, 1978).
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994): the proclamation is subject to judicial review; majority must be tested on the floor of the House, not in the Governor’s chamber; the Assembly should not be dissolved until Parliament approves the proclamation; secularism and federalism are basic features.
5. Commissions on Centre-State relations
| Body | Year | Set up by | Key ideas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rajamannar Committee | 1969 | Government of Tamil Nadu | Greater State autonomy; review of Article 356 |
| Sarkaria Commission | 1983 (report 1988) | Union Government | Permanent Inter-State Council; Article 356 only as a last resort; Governor to be a detached outsider; consultation with Chief Minister on Governor’s appointment |
| Punchhi Commission | 2007 (report 2010) | Union Government | Fixed five-year tenure for Governors; removal only by resolution of the State legislature; “localised emergency” provisions |
Memory Anchors
The three “Parliament-on-State-subject” routes in peacetime: “Nation, Neighbours, Nations” → 249 (National interest via Rajya Sabha), 252 (Neighbouring States ask for it), 253 (Nations — treaties).
Grants pair: “275 is Statutory, 282 is Spontaneous” — 275 flows on Finance Commission advice; 282 is discretionary.
42nd Amendment transfers — “E-F-W-W-J”: Education, Forests, Weights and measures, Wild animals and birds, Justice (administration of).
One-line Mains hooks:
- “India is an indestructible Union of destructible States” — Parliament can reshape States (Article 3), but no State can leave.
- S.R. Bommai (1994): the floor of the House, not the Raj Bhavan, decides majority.
For Prelims
- Residuary powers lie with Parliament (Article 248) — like Canada, unlike the USA.
- Article 249 needs a Rajya Sabha resolution only — the Lok Sabha plays no part.
- A law under Article 252 can be amended or repealed only by Parliament, even in the States that requested it.
- The Inter-State Council (1990) is created by Presidential order under Article 263, not by the Constitution directly or by a statute.
- Zonal Councils are statutory (States Reorganisation Act, 1956), not constitutional.
- GST Council: Union one-third vote, States two-thirds, decisions by three-fourths; quorum is one-half of the total members.
- President’s Rule: approval in two months; National Emergency approval: one month.
For Mains
- Dimensions: constitutional (division of powers, Articles 200, 356); fiscal (vertical imbalance — States carry most spending duties but the Union raises most revenue; cesses and surcharges outside the divisible pool); political (Governor’s role, use of central agencies); institutional (Inter-State Council meeting rarely, GST Council as a model of pooled sovereignty).
- Keywords: cooperative federalism, competitive federalism, fiscal federalism, asymmetric federalism (Article 370’s former status, Article 371 special provisions, Sixth Schedule), pooled sovereignty, vertical and horizontal imbalance.
- Value-addition: S.R. Bommai (1994); Mohit Minerals (2022) on the GST Council; Sarkaria and Punchhi recommendations on Governors; State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab (November 2023) — a Governor who withholds assent must return the bill to the legislature and cannot keep it pending indefinitely.
Common Traps
In the News
- November 2023 — State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab: Governors cannot indefinitely withhold action on bills.
- April 2025 — State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu: bills held deemed assented; timelines read into Articles 200 and 201.
- May 2025 — the President sought the Supreme Court’s advisory opinion under Article 143 on timelines for assent by Governors and the President.
Practice
Prelims
With reference to Article 249 of the Constitution of India, consider the following statements:
- The resolution must be passed by the Rajya Sabha by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
- Once passed, the resolution remains in force for one year and cannot be renewed.
- A law made under this Article ceases to have effect six months after the resolution ceases to be in force.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Solution
Statement 1 is correct — only the Rajya Sabha passes the resolution, by two-thirds of members present and voting. Statement 2 is incorrect — the resolution can be renewed for one year at a time any number of times. Statement 3 is correct — the law lapses six months after the resolution ends.
Answer: B
With reference to the GST Council, consider the following statements:
- It is chaired by the Union Finance Minister.
- The vote of the Union Government carries a weightage of one-third of the total votes cast.
- Every decision is taken by a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present and voting.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Solution
All three are correct under Article 279A, inserted by the 101st Amendment (2016). The States together carry two-thirds of the weighted vote, so neither the Union alone nor the States alone can push a decision through.
Answer: D
How many of the following subjects were transferred from the State List to the Concurrent List by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976?
- Education
- Forests
- Police
- Weights and measures
Solution
Education, forests and weights and measures were transferred (along with protection of wild animals and birds, and administration of justice). Police remains in the State List. That makes three.
Answer: C
Mains
The office of the Governor has repeatedly become a point of friction between the Union and the States. Examine the constitutional position and suggest reforms.
Solution
Introduction: The Governor is the constitutional head of a State (Article 153), appointed by the President (Article 155) and holding office during the President’s pleasure (Article 156) — a link between the Union and the State.
Body:
- Sources of friction: delay in assent to bills (Article 200); reservation of bills for the President (Article 201); discretion in inviting parties to form government; reports recommending Article 356; role as university chancellor under State laws.
- Judicial position: S.R. Bommai (1994) — floor test, judicial review of Article 356; Punjab (2023) — no indefinite withholding; Tamil Nadu (2025) — inaction on bills is reviewable.
- Reform proposals: Sarkaria — appoint a detached person from outside the State, after consulting the Chief Minister; Punchhi — fixed tenure and removal by a State legislature resolution; codified conventions and time limits on assent.
Conclusion: The Governor works best as a constitutional sentinel, not a political agent. Clear conventions and timelines would protect both the Union’s oversight role and the States’ democratic mandate.
Quick Revision
| Point | One-liner |
|---|---|
| Article 1 | “Union of States” — no right to secede |
| Residuary powers | Parliament (Article 248; Entry 97, List I) |
| Article 249 | Rajya Sabha, two-thirds present and voting; law lapses 6 months after |
| Article 252 | Two or more States consent; only Parliament amends |
| Article 254(2) | Reserved State law with President’s assent prevails in that State |
| Article 263 | Inter-State Council, set up 1990 by Presidential order |
| Article 279A | GST Council; Union 1/3 vote, States 2/3, decisions 3/4 |
| Article 282 | Discretionary grants for any public purpose |
| S.R. Bommai (1994) | Floor test; Article 356 reviewable; federalism a basic feature |
| Commissions | Rajamannar 1969 (TN); Sarkaria 1983; Punchhi 2007 |
Key Takeaways
- Indian federalism divides power but tilts it towards the Union — by design, for unity and integrity.
- Parliament can legislate on State subjects in five situations: Articles 249, 250, 252, 253 and 356.
- Fiscal federalism rests on the Finance Commission (Article 280) and, since 2017, on the GST Council (Article 279A).
- S.R. Bommai converted Article 356 from a political weapon into a reviewable, last-resort power.
Related Topics
- Federalism — quick revision
- Federalism — practice questions
- State Government
- Constitutional Bodies (Finance Commission, GST Council)
- Taxation and GST
- Comparison with Other Constitutions