Parliamentary Devices, Committees and Privileges
How Parliament holds the executive to account — Question Hour, Zero Hour, motions, financial and departmental committees, and Article 105 privileges.
SyllabusGS II · Parliament and State legislatures — structure, functioning, conduct of business, powers and privileges
Prerequisites: Law-Making in Parliament
The Hook: Does Privilege Protect a Bribe?
In March 2024, a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court decided Sita Soren v. Union of India. It unanimously overruled the 1998 judgment in P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State, which had held that legislators who took bribes to vote in a particular way were immune from prosecution if they actually voted as agreed. The Court held that bribery is not protected by parliamentary privilege under Articles 105 and 194 — the offence is complete when the bribe is taken, and privilege exists to protect the House’s functioning, not individual corruption.
The case raises a broader question: what tools and protections does Parliament have to hold the executive accountable — and where do those protections end?
The Core Concept
Parliament controls the executive through three channels: devices used on the floor, committees that scrutinise in detail, and privileges that let members do both without fear.
Question Hour and Zero Hour
| Device | What it is | Key facts |
|---|---|---|
| Question Hour | The first hour of every sitting, for questions to ministers | Regulated by the rules of each House |
| Starred question | Oral answer; marked with an asterisk | Supplementary questions allowed |
| Unstarred question | Written answer | No supplementaries |
| Short notice question | Asked with less than ten days’ notice; oral answer | Matters of urgent public importance |
| Zero Hour | Time immediately after Question Hour when members raise matters without prior notice | An Indian innovation; not mentioned in the rules of procedure; in use since the early 1960s |
Questions may also be addressed to private members on Bills or resolutions they are in charge of.
Motions
| Motion | Purpose | Key facts |
|---|---|---|
| Adjournment motion | Draws attention to a definite matter of urgent public importance; involves an element of censure | Lok Sabha only; needs the support of 50 members; debate of at least two and a half hours |
| Calling attention motion | Calls a minister’s attention to an urgent matter, seeking an authoritative statement | An Indian innovation; part of the rules |
| No-confidence motion | Tests whether the Council of Ministers retains the confidence of the House | Lok Sabha only (Rule 198); needs 50 members; no reasons need be stated; if passed, the Council must resign |
| Censure motion | Censures the government or a minister for specific policies or acts | Reasons must be stated; can target a single minister; if passed, the government is not constitutionally bound to resign |
| Motion of thanks | Thanks the President for the address under Article 87 | Its defeat amounts to a defeat of the government |
| Privilege motion | Moved when a minister is alleged to have breached the privilege of the House (for example, by misleading it) | Examined by the Committee of Privileges |
| Cut motions | Reduce demands for grants — policy, economy or token cuts | During voting on the budget |
Other devices: point of order (raised when proceedings depart from the rules), half-an-hour discussion, short duration discussion (on matters of urgent public importance) and special mentions (Rajya Sabha; in the Lok Sabha, matters under Rule 377).
Parliamentary committees
Committees are either standing (permanent, constituted every year or periodically) or ad hoc (created for a purpose and dissolved after reporting, such as select committees and joint committees on Bills).
The three financial committees
| Committee | Origin | Composition | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Accounts Committee (PAC) | 1921, under the Government of India Act, 1919 | 22 members — 15 Lok Sabha + 7 Rajya Sabha; one-year term | Examines the CAG’s audit reports on appropriation and finance accounts; chairman appointed by the Speaker — by convention since 1967, from the Opposition; no minister can be a member |
| Estimates Committee | First constituted in 1950 | 30 members, all from the Lok Sabha | Suggests economies in expenditure — the “continuous economy committee”; examines estimates after they are passed |
| Committee on Public Undertakings | 1964, on the recommendation of the Krishna Menon Committee | 22 members — 15 Lok Sabha + 7 Rajya Sabha | Examines reports and accounts of public sector undertakings and the CAG’s reports on them |
Departmentally Related Standing Committees (DRSCs)
- Set up in 1993 (17 committees) and expanded to 24 in 2004.
- Each has 31 members — 21 from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha.
- 16 function under the Lok Sabha and 8 under the Rajya Sabha.
- They examine demands for grants, Bills referred to them, annual reports and long-term policy documents of the ministries. They do not consider day-to-day administration.
Other standing committees include the Business Advisory Committee, the Committee of Privileges, the Committee on Petitions, the Committee on Government Assurances, the Committee on Subordinate Legislation, the Ethics Committees and the Committees on the Welfare of SCs and STs.
graph TD
A[Parliamentary committees] --> B[Standing]
A --> C[Ad hoc]
B --> D[Financial: PAC, Estimates, Public Undertakings]
B --> E[24 Departmentally Related Standing Committees]
B --> F[Inquiry, scrutiny, service and house-keeping committees]
C --> G[Inquiry committees]
C --> H[Advisory: select and joint committees on Bills]Parliamentary privileges (Article 105; Article 194 for States)
Privileges are special rights enjoyed by each House, its committees and its members, so that they can function without obstruction. They also extend to persons entitled to speak in the House, such as ministers and the Attorney General — but not to the President, who is part of Parliament but not a member.
| Individual privileges | Collective privileges |
|---|---|
| Freedom of speech in Parliament (Art 105(1)), subject to the Constitution and the rules | Right to publish its reports and proceedings, and to prohibit others from doing so |
| Immunity from court proceedings for anything said or any vote given in Parliament or its committees (Art 105(2)) | Right to exclude strangers and hold secret sittings |
| Freedom from arrest in civil cases during a session and 40 days before and after it (not in criminal cases or preventive detention) | Right to make its own rules of procedure |
| Exemption from jury service; may refuse to give evidence in court while Parliament is in session | Right to punish members and outsiders for breach of privilege or contempt |
| Courts cannot inquire into the proceedings of a House (Art 122) |
- Article 105(3): other privileges were to be those of the British House of Commons until Parliament defined them — the 44th Amendment (1978) replaced this reference with “those of each House… at the commencement of” that amendment. Parliament has not codified privileges by law.
- Sita Soren (2024): bribery is outside the protection of Articles 105(2) and 194(2).
Memory Anchors
Lok Sabha–only motions: “All Night Long” → Adjournment and No-confidence — only in the Lok Sabha.
Indian innovations: “Zero hour and Calling attention — Zero Cost to the rules” → Zero Hour is not in the rules; calling attention is an Indian innovation that is.
Financial committees by numbers: “22-30-22” → PAC 22, Estimates 30 (all Lok Sabha), Public Undertakings 22.
DRSCs: “24 × 31 = 21 + 10” → 24 committees of 31 members each, 21 from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha.
One-line Mains hook: Question Hour is the time when the executive is answerable “in person” to the people’s representatives — the most direct form of accountability in a parliamentary system.
For Prelims
- Zero Hour is not in the rules of procedure; calling attention is an Indian innovation included in the rules.
- Adjournment and no-confidence motions — Lok Sabha only, with 50 members’ support.
- No-confidence: no reasons needed; censure: reasons required.
- PAC: 22 members (15 + 7); Estimates: 30, all Lok Sabha; Public Undertakings: 22 (15 + 7).
- PAC chairman from the Opposition by convention since 1967.
- DRSCs: 24 committees; 31 members each.
- Freedom from arrest covers civil cases only.
For Mains
- Dimensions: decline in the share of Bills referred to committees; disruption of Question Hour; uncodified privileges vs freedom of the press; the PAC’s role in financial accountability; the quality of debate and number of sittings.
- Keywords: legislative oversight, executive accountability, committee system, mini-Parliaments, codification of privileges, contempt of the House.
- Value-addition: Sita Soren (2024) on bribery and privilege; the 44th Amendment’s change to Article 105(3); the PAC’s convention of an Opposition chairman since 1967.
Common Traps
In the News
- March 2024 — Sita Soren v. Union of India: seven judges hold that legislators accused of bribery are not shielded by parliamentary privilege, overruling the 1998 P.V. Narasimha Rao judgment.
- June 2024 — the Lok Sabha again had a recognised Leader of the Opposition, a post that had remained vacant through the 16th and 17th Lok Sabhas (2014–2024).
Practice
Prelims
Consider the following statements:
- Zero Hour is an Indian innovation in parliamentary procedure and is not mentioned in the rules of procedure.
- An adjournment motion can be moved in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
- A no-confidence motion need not state the reasons for its adoption.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Solution
Statement 1 is correct — Zero Hour is an informal Indian practice. Statement 2 is incorrect — the adjournment motion is available only in the Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is correct — no reasons are required, unlike a censure motion.
Answer: A
Which of the following parliamentary committees consists of members drawn only from the Lok Sabha?
Solution
The Estimates Committee has 30 members, all from the Lok Sabha. The PAC and the Committee on Public Undertakings each have 15 Lok Sabha and 7 Rajya Sabha members; each DRSC has 21 Lok Sabha and 10 Rajya Sabha members.
Answer: D
How many of the following are entitled to the privileges available under Article 105 of the Constitution?
- Members of Parliament
- The Attorney General of India
- The President of India
- A Union minister who is not yet a member of either House
Solution
Article 105(4) extends the privileges to persons who have the right to speak in and take part in proceedings of a House — this covers MPs, the Attorney General and ministers (including a minister who is not yet a member, under Article 88). The President, though part of Parliament, is not covered. That makes three.
Answer: C
Mains
Parliamentary committees are called “mini-Parliaments”. Discuss their role in ensuring executive accountability and suggest measures to strengthen them.
Solution
Introduction: Much of Parliament’s detailed scrutiny happens in committees — financial committees, the 24 Departmentally Related Standing Committees, and select or joint committees on Bills.
Body:
- Role:
- Detailed, non-partisan examination away from the glare of the floor.
- PAC scrutiny of CAG reports enforces financial accountability.
- DRSCs examine demands for grants and Bills, consult experts and stakeholders.
- Continuity of expertise across sessions.
- Concerns: declining reference of Bills to committees; low attendance; reports not debated; limited research support; recommendations not binding.
- Measures: mandatory referral of most Bills; longer committee tenures; dedicated research staff; time on the floor to debate reports; action-taken reports within fixed timelines.
Conclusion: Strong committees turn Parliament from a forum of debate into an institution of deliberation and oversight.
Quick Revision
| Point | One-liner |
|---|---|
| Question Hour | First hour; starred (oral + supplementaries), unstarred (written), short notice |
| Zero Hour | Indian innovation; not in the rules |
| Adjournment motion | Lok Sabha only; 50 members |
| No-confidence | Lok Sabha only; 50 members; no reasons |
| PAC | 22 (15 + 7); CAG reports; Opposition chair since 1967 |
| Estimates | 30, all Lok Sabha; “continuous economy committee” |
| Public Undertakings | 22 (15 + 7); 1964 |
| DRSCs | 24 × 31 members; 16 under Lok Sabha, 8 under Rajya Sabha |
| Privileges | Art 105; civil arrest immunity; not codified; Sita Soren (2024) |
Key Takeaways
- Floor devices give daily accountability; committees give detailed scrutiny.
- Know which motions are Lok Sabha–only and which devices are Indian innovations.
- Committee numbers (22, 30, 22; 24 × 31) are favourite Prelims material.
- Privileges protect the House’s work, not members’ crimes — Sita Soren (2024).
Related Topics
- Law-Making in Parliament
- Parliament — quick revision
- Parliament — practice questions
- Constitutional Bodies
- Governance, Transparency and Accountability